Everything it can do
It is not an assistant suggesting lines while you code, nor a model working on its own. It is 30+ years of craft turned into an automated process, from working out what is needed to leaving it deployed.
A craft, not a loose model
What we automate is not «writing code with AI». It is the way teams with 30+ years of shipping software actually work: the methods that held up, the decisions that avoided disasters and the lessons that were expensive to learn. That process was refined over years and now runs on its own, the same on every ticket.
The discipline of a veteran team
Understand before building, ask before assuming, test before delivering and never ship without a person approving. A model does not bring that: the process that governs it does.
Judgement built in, not improvised
Minimal change, reuse before creating, no secrets in the code and no dead code. These are craft rules written into the system, not suggestions that depend on the day.
As good on Monday as on Friday
An automated process has no bad days and no last-minute rush. The same discipline applies to the first ticket of the month and to the one that lands on a Friday at seven.
People where they decide
Automating the process is not about removing people: it is about taking them out of the repetition and putting them where their judgement changes the outcome.
Coding tickets, end to end
The daily work that consumes your team today.
From ticket to code
A ticket written in plain language becomes an implemented change, with its tests run and its change proposal opened.
No ticket limit
There is no monthly quota and no invoice per delivered task. The pace is set by the engine, which works on one ticket at a time per component.
It runs your tests
It runs your project's install, test and build commands, fixes what breaks and adds the tests the change requires.
It works with your conventions
Minimal change, reuse before creating, no secrets in the code, no dead code and no debugging leftovers.
It reads the ticket's images
It downloads the screenshots and attached documents and hands them to the agent. A screenshot of a bug is worth more than three paragraphs describing it.
It understands your designs
If the ticket links a Figma design, the agent reads it directly instead of asking you how it should look.
Planning, not just executing
The part that normally requires a person to sit down and break things apart.
It breaks down large features
Mark a ticket as a feature and the system splits it into implementable tasks, each self-contained and verifiable, with their dependencies between them.
It creates the plan's tickets
Every task in the plan becomes a real ticket in your tracker, linked and ordered by dependencies, with a published index of the plan.
The plan waits for your go-ahead
A newly created plan does not start on its own: it waits for you to approve it.
Two versions of the same plan
A business-language summary so the owner can approve it without jargon, and the full technical plan as an attached document for whoever implements it.
Auditing the code you already have
A product in its own right, and the best way to know what you are building on.
Seven reviews in order
Discovery, architecture and quality, security, data and concurrency, testing and performance, infrastructure, and maintainability and business risk.
Every finding with its evidence
Exact location by file and line, evidence, impact, root cause, a concrete remediation and how to verify it was fixed.
A reproducible score
The score is calculated with a fixed formula, not invented by a model. Two reviews of the same code give the same number.
It says what it could not verify
Findings are classified by degree of certainty, and only the confirmed and likely ones count against the score. What could not be checked is declared as such.
A work plan by urgency
The report orders findings into time brackets and points out the quick wins: what gets fixed soon and pays off right away.
Read-only, guaranteed
The auditor cannot write to your code. It is not a promise from the system: it is a technical restriction on the tools it is allowed.
Finding work before it hurts
The system looks at your project and tells you what is worth addressing.
It detects technical debt
Vulnerable dependencies, missing tests, duplicated code and accumulated debt, each finding with its severity.
It proposes, it does not impose
Findings arrive as proposals in the portal. The ticket is only created when you approve the proposal.
Periodic review
You can schedule the analysis to repeat every month without anyone having to remember.
With its own budget
Every analysis has a spending cap, and if it reaches it, it delivers what it found up to that point instead of losing it.
Projects with several pieces
Almost no product lives in a single repository.
Several components per project
One project can have its backend, its admin panel, its website and its mobile app, each with its own commands and its own branch.
Monorepos and standalone repos, together
Several components inside a monorepo plus an app in its own repository. The engine clones each repository only once.
It splits the ticket by component
A change that touches several pieces is divided into subtasks and run in dependency order: first what exposes the interface, then what consumes it.
It defines the contract between pieces
When the change crosses components, it first settles which endpoints and which data are exchanged, so the parts fit together.
It fits the way you work
Your columns, your names
If your column is called Testing instead of Review, the system adapts to your board instead of imposing its own.
It sets up your tracker on its own
It creates the states, labels and templates it needs. Running the setup again is safe: it duplicates nothing.
It works in your language
Spanish, English and French. The agents talk to you, comment on tickets and send alerts in your project's language.
Schedule the work
A ticket can have a start date and time, in your time zone. If the model runs out of quota, it retries later on its own.
It detects external deployments
If you deploy on your own, the system recognises what is already in production and closes those tickets. It never reverts or reopens anything.
Reply wherever suits you
By commenting on the ticket, through Telegram or from the portal. Everything ends up in the same place: the ticket thread.
On the way
What we are building. It appears here because it is decided, not because it sounds good.
Documentation that writes itself
Coming soonHaving the work done produce documentation of the process and answers to the questions that came up along the way, without anyone sitting down to write them.
A knowledge base for the project
Coming soonHaving everything learned on each ticket feed the next one: more accumulated context, fewer assumptions. The asset grows with every task delivered.
Manuals for your users
Coming soonTurning what was built into material your own users can read, not just your technical team.
Chat to create the ticket
Coming soonLetting someone without a technical background describe the symptom in a conversation while the system drafts the actionable ticket, asking for what is missing before creating it.
Tickets from real errors
Coming soonDetecting a failure in production and opening the ticket without waiting for a person to describe it.
From the idea to the launched product
Coming soonStarting before the first ticket: from an idea or a design to the project scaffolding and the first product up and running.
Try it with one of your tickets
Seven days free. The best way to know what it can do for you is to give it something to do.